联系我们
Isaac Scientific Publishing
Advances in Food Science and Engineering
AFSE > Volume 4, Number 2, September 2020

An Analysis of Household Foods Demand in Rural Burundi

Download PDF  (474.4 KB)PP. 15-22,  Pub. Date:December 16, 2020
DOI: 10.22606/afse.2020.42001

Author(s)
Arnaud Niyomwungere, Yu Wen
Affiliation(s)
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Agricultural Information Institute, Beijing 100081, China
Abstract
This study was aimed to investigate the roles of income and other socioeconomic variables such as household size, land size, head of household education level, raising the animals, source of income on food demand in rural Burundi. The needs for foods among the households in rural Burundi were examined using a recent survey done by the authors. An almost ideal demand system (AIDS) was laboring to evaluate the price and expenditure elasticities and the influence of socioeconomic variables on food demand products. An econometric model was then involved in analyzing the factors of food demand. The assessed expenditure elasticities for the food groups settled from 0.64 for oils to 1.36 for meats. The outcomes showed that there is a raised expenses elasticity for meats, fish, cereals and grains. The appraisal showed that the revenue and other socioeconomic variables exerted significant effects on food demand, and important expenditure elasticity for food group items will increase remarkably with rising income.
Keywords
almost ideal demand system (AIDS), food demand, non-parametric estimation, instrumental variables, Burundi.
References
  • [1]  1. Abdulai A, Aubert D., “A cross-section analysis of household demand for food and nutrients in Tanzania,” J Agric Econ, 2004, vol 31 no. 1, pp. 67-79.
  • [2]  2. Li Y., Yu, W., “Households Food Security in Poverty-Stricken Regions: Evidence from Western Rural China,” Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 1, 2010, pp. 386–395.
  • [3]  3. Liu, H., Parton K. A., and Zhou, Zh. et al., “At- home meat consumption in China: an empirical study,” Aust J Agr Resour Ec, 2009, vol 53 no. 4, pp. 485-501.
  • [4]  4. Deaton A, Muellbauer J., “An almost ideal demand system,” Am Econ Rev, 1980, vol 70 no. 3, pp. 312-326.
  • [5]  5. Moschini, G. and Meilke, K., “Modeling the pattern of structural change in U.S Meat demand,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol 71 no. 2, pp. 253-62, 1989.
  • [6]  6. Deaton, A., and L. Muellbauer. 1980a, An almost ideal demand system. Amer. Econ. Rev. 70, pp. 312-26. Deaton, A., and L. Muellbauer. 1980b, Economics and consumer behavior, Cambridge, Univ. Press, U.K
  • [7]  7. Cox, L., and K. Wohlgenant., “Prices and quality effects in cross-sectional demand analysis,” Amer. J. Agric. Econ. vol 68, pp.908-919.1986.
  • [8]  8. Fan, J., “Design-adaptive non-parametric regression,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. vol 87, pp. 998-1004.
  • [9]  9. World Food Programme Burundi Country Brief, April 2019, Available at https://www1.wfp.org
Copyright © 2020 Isaac Scientific Publishing Co. All rights reserved.