Journal of Particle Physics

Download PDF (762.8 KB) PP. 1 - 13 Pub. Date: January 2, 2020

DOI: 10.22606/jpp.2020.41001

• Marius Arghirescu^*
  State Office for Inventions and Trademarks, OSIM, Romania

The paper is based on a cold genesis theory of the author, (CGT), in which the proton results as formed by a neutral Np cluster of degenerate electrons and an attached positron with degenerate spin and magnetic moment. Also, the neutron results in a “dynamide” model, as formed by a proton and a degenerate electron with degenerate spin and magnetic moment, with its centroid incorporated in the proton quantum volume and rotated around the proton center. In the paper it is shown that the stable nuclei with “magic” or semi-“magic” number of protons or and neutrons: 2; 8; 20; 28; (32, 36, 40); 50; 82; 126, are retrieved by a quasi-crystalline nuclear model of ground state T0K, as sum of quasi-crystalline forms with integer number of alpha particles with 2n2 protons and 4n2 nucleons having small deformation parameter, for the double 'magic' nuclei. This possibility may be explained by the dynamide model of neutron of CGT by the hypothesis of 0- neutron clusters cold forming at T0K and the generating of small square forms of neutral 0- particles which are transformed into nuclei by 0-particles transforming into + and 2+ particles which attract new 0-particles, the process being repeated until the forming of double magic nuclei which may attract nucleons or 0-clusters transformed thereafter into + clusters, or of nuclei with “magic” mass number. According to the model, the nucleus 208Pb82 corresponds to the initial form: 208N104 (Z=2(42+62)) in which 22 attracted 0-clusters were transformed into + clusters, by - radiation emission. The proposed model predicts that the nuclei with A=4(52+72)=296, A=4×(62+2×42+2×22=304) nucleons and Z=114120 are more stable in the ground state than the forms: 114/184, 120/182 predicted with the “nuclear shells” model. Also, it results as possible the forming of cold semi- “magic” nuclei with hexagonal symmetry, with the mass number A=(3×4n2), (n=1…5).

crystalline nuclear model, magic nuclei, dynamide neutron model, tetra-neutron, cold genesis

[1] M. Arghirescu,“The material structures genesis and field effects”, Ed. MatrixROM, Bucharest, (2006)

[2] M. Arghirescu, ‘The nuclear force explaining by a bag model resulted from a vortexial, cold genesis model of nucleon’, Phys. Astron. Int. J. (2018); 2(4):349-358. DOI: 10.15406/paij.2018.02.00109

[3] M. Arghirescu, “The Cold Genesis of Matter and Fields”, Ed. Science PG, (2015).

[4] M. Arghirescu, ‘A Quasi-Unitary Pre-Quantum Theory of Particles and Fields and Some Theoretical Implications’, IJHEP, July, 80-103, (2015).

[5] M. Arghirescu, ‘A preonic quasi-crystal quark model based on a cold genesis theory and on the experimentally evidenced neutral boson of 34 me’, Global Journal of Physics Vol. 5, No 1, (2016), pp.496-504

[6] A. J. Krasznahorkay et al., ‘Observation of Anomalous Internal Pair Creation in 8Be: A Possible Signature of a Light, Neutral Boson’, arXiv: 1504.01527v1, [nucl-ex], 7 April (2015).

[7] R. D. Chipman, L. D. Jennings, Phys. Rev. 132 (1995) 728. CERNCOURIER, ‘Precision pins down the electron’s magnetism’, 4 oct. (2006).

[8] ZEUS Collaboration, ‘Limits on the effective quark radius from inclusive e-p scattering at HERA’ Physics Letters B, 757 (2016) 468–472

[9] M. Bhuyan, B. V. Carlson, S. K. Patra, Shan-Gui Zhou, ‘Surface properties of neutron-rich exotic nuclei within relativistic mean field formalisms’ Phys. Rev. C 97, 024322, 20 Feb. (2018)

[10] M. Bhuyan, S. K. Patra, ‘Magic Nuclei in Superheavy Valley’, Modern Physics Letters A Vol. 27, No. 30, 1250173 (2012)

[11] S. K. Biswal, M. Bhuyan et al., ‘Search of double shell closure in the superheavy nuclei using a simple effective interaction’, Int. Journ. of Modern Physics E, Oct. 2, (2018), pp. 1-15; arXiv:1401.4659v1 [nucl-th] 19 Jan 2014

[12] S. Ahmad, M. Bhuyan, S. K. Patra, ‘Properties of Z = 120 nuclei and the α-decay chains of the 292, 304120 isotopes using relativistic and non-relativistic formalism’, Int. J. of Mod. Phys. E, Vol. 21, No 11, 1250092 (2012)

[13] W. Nazarewicz, ‘The limits of nuclear mass and charge’, Nature Phys. Vol. 14, (2018), pp. 537–541

[14] Yu. Ts. Oganessian, V. K. Utyonkov, ‘Super-heavy element research’, Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 78, No 3, 9 March (2015)

[15] W. Bauer, Proc. of 1st Catania Relativistic Ion Studies, Asicastello, Italy (1996) 23.

[16] T. Lonnroth, Il Nuovo Cimento 110A (1997) 961.

[17] T. Schmidt, Z. Phys., 106 (1937) 358.

[18] B. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure, Les Houches, Session LXVI, 25 (1996).

[19] J.P. Ebran, E. Khan, T. Niksic′, D. Vretenar, ‘Cluster-liquid transition in finite saturated fermionic Systems’, arXiv:1402.5080v2 [nucl-th] 19 Mars 2014

[20] A. Sandulescu et. al - Nucl. Phys., 48 (1963) 345.

[21] K. N. Muhin – “Experimental Nuclear Physics”, Vol. 1, Ed. “Atomizdat”, Moscow (1974).

[22] K. A. Gridnev, S. E. Belov, K. V. Ershov, et al., Proc. Int. Conf. on Perspectives in Nucl. Phys., Crete, Greece, Athens (1999).

[23] C. F. von Weizsäcker, Z. Phys. 96, p. 431, (1935).

[24] K. Kisamori et al., ‘Candidate Resonant Tetraneutron State Populated by the 4He(8He,8Be) Reaction’, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 052501, Vol. 116, Iss. 5, (2016)

[25] K. Fossez, J. Rotureau, N. Michel, M. Ploszajczak –‘Can Tetraneutron be a Narrow Resonance?’ Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 032501 –21 July (2017)

[26] Elizabeth A. Donley, N. R., Claussen, S. L. et al. ‘Dynamics of collapsing and exploding Bose-Einstein condensates’, arXiv: cond-mat/0105019v3, June (2001).

[27] W. D. Myers, W. J. Swiatecki, ‘Nuclear masses and deformations’, Nucl. Phys., Vol. 81, Iss. 1, June (1966), pp. 1-60

[28] G. Royer and C. Gautier, ‘On the coefficients and terms of the liquid drop model and mass formula’, arXiv:nuclth/ 0608064v1, (2006).

[29] W. Greiner, Nuclear Shells in the Superheavy Region within Meson Field Theory’, J. Nucl. Radiochem. Sci., Vol. 3, No. 1, (2002), 159-166