Isaac Scientific Publishing

Journal of Advances in Economics and Finance

The Long and the Short of It: Maximizing the Impact of Public Service Announcements in the Age of the “Twitterverse”

Download PDF (369.2 KB) PP. 1 - 11 Pub. Date: February 1, 2018

DOI: 10.22606/jaef.2018.31001

Author(s)

  • Harper Roehm Jr.*
    Marketing, Entrepreneurship, Hospitality and Tourism, Bryan School of Business and Economics, University North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States

Abstract

This article reports the results of an empirical study of current public service announcements. We apply a framework of communication norms espoused by Grice (1975) to identify a structural dimension of public service announcements – conciseness – that has been relatively understudied and that may be crucial to understanding the level of audience impact that is achieved. Further, recognizing the evolving concerns of sponsors in a marketplace flooded with novel modes of communication, we examine potential differences in the dynamics of conciseness as a function of the conventions of “new” (e.g., web-based) versus “traditional” (e.g., standard television, print) media environments. Results garnered from testing two forms of new media and two forms of traditional media suggest that persuasiveness varies with message length in opposing directions. For new media, messages that were briefer created a stronger impression, whereas for messages in traditional media, greater duration corresponded to greater impact.

Keywords

Public Service Announcements; new media; communication norms.

References

[1] Adjei, M. T., Noble, S. M. & Noble, C. H. (2011). The influence of C2C communications in online brand communities on customer purchase behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38, 634-653.

[2] Anand Keller, P. & Block, L. G. (1999). Vividness effects: A resource-matching perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (Dec), 295-304.

[3] Brown, I. (2009). Give me twitter or give me death: Six million North Americans now tweet. Is it a bid to stave off the randomness of fate, Ian Brown asks, or is it the tower of babble? The Globe and Mail (March 28), F1.

[4] Cacioppo, J. T. & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42 (1), 116-131.

[5] Chaiken, S. & Eagly, A. H. (1983). Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (2), 241-256.

[6] Chaiken, S., Liberman, A. & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J.S. Uleman & J.A. Bargh (Eds.) Unintended thought (pp. 212-252), New York: Guilford Press.

[7] Eagly, A. H. & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes, Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

[8] Fishbein, M., Hall-Jamieson, K., Zimmer, E., von Haeften, I. & Nabi, R. (2002). Avoiding the boomerang: Testing the relative effectiveness of anti-drug public service announcements before a national campaign. American Journal of Public Health, 92 (2), 238-245.

[9] Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.

[10] Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-53), New York: Academic Press.

[11] Hayes, M. (2009). They will kill us all. The International Herald Tribune, November 13, 8.

[12] Jones, G. M. & Schieffelin, B. B. (2009). Talking text and talking back: “My BFF Jill” from boob tube to YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 1050-1079.

[13] Levine, T. R. & Hullett, C. R. (2002). Eta squared, partial eta squared, and misreporting of effect size in communication research. Human Communication Research, 28 (4), 612-625.

[14] Lorch, E. P., Palmgreen, P., Donohew, L., Helm, D., Baer, S. A. & Dsilva, M. I. (1994). Program context, sensation seeking, and attention to televised anti-drug public service announcements. Human Communication Research, 20 (3), 390-412.

[15] Luna, D., Peracchio, L. A. & de Juan, M. D. (2002). Crosscultural and cognitive aspects of web site navigation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30 (4), 397-410.

[16] Martiniuk, A. L. C., Secco, M., Yake, L. & Speechley, K. N. (2010). Evaluating the effect of a television public service announcement about epilepsy. Health Education Research, 25 (6), 1050-1060.

[17] Morgan, S. E., Palmgreen, P., Stephenson, M. T., Hoyle, R. H. & Lorch, E. P. (2003). Associations between message features and subjective evaluations of the sensation value of antidrug public service announcements. Journal of Communication, 53 (3), 512-526.

[18] Murry, J. P., Stam, A. & Lastovicka, J. L. (1996). Paid- versus donated-media strategies for public service announcement campaigns. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 1-29.

[19] Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (pp. 265), New York: McGraw-Hill.

[20] O’Dea, J.A. (2005). Prevention of child obesity: First, do no harm. Health Education Research, 20 (2), 259-265.

[21] Pechmann, C. & Knight, S. J. (2002). An experimental investigation of the joint effects of advertising and peers on adolescents’ beliefs and intentions about cigarette consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (June), 5-19.

[22] Pechmann, C. & Reibling, E. T. (2006). Antismoking advertisements for youths: An independent evaluation of health, counter-industry and industry approaches. American Journal of Public Health, 96 (5), 906-913.

[23] Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986a). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change, New York: Springer-Verlag.

[24] Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986b). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 19, (pp. 123-205), San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

[25] Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J.T. & Schumann, D. W. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (2), 135-146.

[26] Roberto, A. J., Meyer, G., Johnson, A. J., Atkin, C. K. & Smith, P. K. (2002). Promoting gun trigger-lock use: Insights and implications from a radio-based health communication intervention. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30 (3), 210-230.

[27] Rosnow, R. & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Effect sizes for experimenting psychologists. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 221-237.

[28] Shanahan, K. J., Hopkins, C. D. & Carlson, L. (2010). The unintended consequences of using “Posers” in nonprofit public service announcements and proposed self-regulatory disclosure solutions. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 29 (2), 219-231.

[29] Siu, W. (2010). Interactive source and message effects in persuasion. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110 (2), 493-500.

[30] Toncar, M., Reid, J. S. & Anderson, C. E. (2007). Effective spokespersons in a public service announcement: National celebrities, local celebrities and victims. Journal of Communication Management, 11 (3), 258-275.

[31] Walther, J. B., DeAndrea, D., Kim, J. & Anthony, J. C. (2010). The influence of online comments on perceptions of antimarajuana public service announcements on YouTube. Human Communication Research, 36, 469-492.

[32] Zhao, G. & Pechmann, C. (2007). The impact of regulatory focus on adolescents’ response to antismoking advertising campaigns. Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (Nov), 671-687.