Isaac Scientific Publishing

Journal of Advances in Education Research

Development and Validation of the Energy-Issue Attitude Questionnaire: Relations with Energy Knowledge, Affect, and Behavior

Download PDF (375.1 KB) PP. 25 - 37 Pub. Date: February 1, 2018

DOI: 10.22606/jaer.2018.31003

Author(s)

  • Mei-Shiu Chiu*
    National Chengchi University, Taiwan
  • Jan DeWaters
    Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, USA

Abstract

This study aims to develop the Energy-Issue Attitude Questionnaire (EIAQ). The EIAQ focuses on student responses to energy issues in society and includes ten constructs, organized pairwise with tension: energy-saving vs. carbon-reducing knowledge, having vs. being lifestyles, questioning vs. conforming to authorities, technology vs. nature approaches, and future vs. present goals. The EIAQ was validated with a criterion questionnaire on energy literacy, including knowledge, affect and behavior. Research participants were 4,689 Taiwanese secondary students. The results show that the EIAQ has desirable construct validity and reliability. Significant differences occur between the two attitudes in each pair. Energy attitudes have medium correlations with energy affect and behavior but low correlations with energy knowledge. The results of structural equation modeling show that energy behavior is directly predicted by 'being' lifestyles and conformity to authorities, and indirectly predicted by energy-saving knowledge, mediated by energy affect.

Keywords

Energy attitudes; energy behavior; energy issues; energy knowledge; adolescence

References

[1] Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

[2] Akabayashi, A. (2011). Fukushima research needs world’s support. Nature, 471, 547.

[3] Aune, M. (2007). Energy comes home. Energy Policy, 35, 5457-5465.

[4] Chai, K. H., & Yeo, C. (2012). Overcoming energy efficiency barriers through systems approach-a conceptual framework. Energy Policy, 46, 460-472.

[5] Chiu, M.-S. (2010). Effects of science interest and environmental responsibility on science aspiration and achievement: Gender differences and cultural supports. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16, 345-370.

[6] Chiu, M.-S. (2012). Gaps between valuing and purchasing green-technology products: Product and gender differences. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 8(3), 54-68.

[7] Chiu, M.-S. (2013). Tensions in implementing the “energy-conservation/carbon-reduction” policy in Taiwanese culture. Energy Policy, 55, 415-425.

[8] DeWaters, J. E., & Powers, S. E. (2011). Energy literacy of secondary students in New York State (USA): A measure of knowledge, affect, and behavior. Energy Policy, 39, 1699-1710.

[9] Fleishman, L. A., De Bruin, W. B., & Morgan, M. G. (2010). Informed public preferences for electricity portfolios with CCS and other low-carbon technologies. Risk Analysis, 30, 1399-1410.

[10] Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27, 699-718.

[11] Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

[12] Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education-A pedagogical justification and the state-of-the-art in Israel, Germany, and the USA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 1459-1483.

[13] Hung, H. C., & Wang, T. W. (2011). Determinants and mapping of collective perceptions of technological risk: The case of the second nuclear power plant in Taiwan. Risk Analysis, 31, 668-683.

[14] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2010). Meeting report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Expert Meeting on detection and attribution related to anthropogenic climate change [Stocker, T. F., C. B. Field, D. Qin, V. Barros, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, P. M. Midgley, and K.L. Ebi (Eds.)]. IPCC Working Group I Technical Support Unit, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, pp. 55.

[15] Jho, H., Yoon, H. G., & Kim, M. (2014). The relationship of science knowledge, attitude and decision making on socio-scientific issues: The case study of students’ debates on a nuclear power plant in Korea. Science & Education, 23, 1131-1151.

[16] Joreskog, K. G. & Sorbom, D. (2007). LISREL 8.80 [computer software]. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International.

[17] Keirstead, J. (2006). Evaluating the applicability of integrated domestic energy consumption frameworks in the UK. Energy Policy, 34, 3065-3077.

[18] Lee, L. S., Lin, K. Y., Guu, Y. H., Chang, L. T., & Lai, C. C. (2013). The effect of hands-on ‘energy-saving house’ learning activities on elementary school students’ knowledge, attitudes, and behavior regarding energy saving and carbon-emissions reduction. Environmental Education Research, 19, 620-638.

[19] Liarakou, G., Gavrilakis, C., & Flouri, E. (2009). Secondary school teachers’ knowledge and attitudes towards renewable energy sources. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 120-129.

[20] McKenzie‐Mohr, D. (2000). Promoting sustainable behavior: An introduction to community‐based social marketing. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 543-554.

[21] Mweemba, L., & Wu, H. (2010). Greening our future and environmental values: An investigation of perception, attitudes and awareness of environmental issues in Zambia. Environmental Values, 19, 485-516.

[22] Ojala, M. (2012). Hope and climate change: The importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 625-642.

[23] Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2012). PISA 2009 technical report. OECD.

[24] Owens, S., & Driffill, L. (2008). How to change attitudes and behaviors in the context of energy. Energy Policy, 36, 4412-4418.

[25] Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667-686.

[26] Raymond, C. M., & Brown, G. (2011). Assessing conservation opportunity on private land: Socio-economic, behavioral, and spatial dimensions. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 2513-2523.

[27] Ricci, M., Bellaby, P., & Flynn, R. (2010). Engaging the public on paths to sustainable energy: Who has to trust whom? Energy Policy, 38, 2633-2640.

[28] Rogelj, J., McCollum, D. L., & Riahi, K. (2013). The UN’s ‘Sustainable Energy for All’ initiative is compatible with a warming limit of 2°C. Nature Climate Change.

[29] Scheer, D., Konrad, W., & Scheel, O. (2013). Public evaluation of electricity technologies and future low-carbon portfolios in Germany and the USA. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 3(1), 1-13.

[30] Schelly, C., Cross, J. E., Franzen, W., Hall, P., & Reeve, S. (2012). How to go green: Creating a conservation culture in a public high school through education, modeling, and communication. Journal of Environmental Education, 43, 143-161.

[31] Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424.

[32] Swofford, J., & Slattery, M. (2010). Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: Local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making. Energy Policy, 38, 2508-2519.

[33] Viklund, M. (2004). Energy policy options-from the perspective of public attitudes and risk perceptions. Energy Policy, 32, 1159-1171.

[34] Vivoda, V. (2012). Japan’s energy security predicament post-Fukushima. Energy Policy, 46, 135-143.

[35] Weber, L. (1997). Some reflections on barriers to the efficient use of energy. Energy Policy, 25, 833-835.

[36] West, J., Bailey, I., & Winter, M. (2010). Renewable energy policy and public perceptions of renewable energy: A cultural theory approach. Energy Policy, 38, 5739-5748.

[37] Whitmarsh, L. (2009). Behavioral responses to climate change: Asymmetry of intentions and impacts. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 13-23.

[38] Wu, Y. H., Chen, C. C., Turcotte, D. L., & Rundle, J. B. (2013). Quantifying the seismicity on Taiwan. Geophysical Journal International, 194, 465-469.

[39] Yu, P.-S., Yang, T.-C., & Chou, C.-C., (2002). Effects of climate change on evapotranspiration from paddy fields in southern Taiwan. Climatic Change, 54, 165-179.

[40] Zografakis, N., Menegaki, A. N., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2008). Effective education for energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 36, 3226-3232.