Isaac Scientific Publishing
Journal of Advances in Education Research
JAER > Volume 2, Number 3, August 2017

Student Achievement Differences as a Function of Principal Longevity

Download PDF  (146.1 KB)PP. 157-162,  Pub. Date:July 31, 2017
DOI: 10.22606/jaer.2017.23003

Author(s)
Hafedh Azaiez, John R. Slate
Affiliation(s)
Department of Educational Leadership, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, United States; Department of Educational Leadership, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, United States
Abstract
In this study, differences in reading and mathematics performances based on principal longevity at the same campus were examined. Data were obtained from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Class of 1998-1999 (ECLS-K) surveys in which information was collected from parents, teachers, and principals. Data were collected from 9,196 campuses across the United States. For purposes of this investigation, information from only the principal component of the ECLS-K was analyzed. For both reading and mathematics, inferential analyses revealed the presence of statistically significant differences based on principal tenure. Students at campuses where principals had six or more years of experience at that campus had statistically significantly higher average reading and mathematics performance than at campuses where principals had less than six years of experience at that campus. School district officials responsible for principal assignment and transfer may consider these findings when making decisions about changing principal’s placement.
Keywords
Student achievement, principal experience, school leadership, ECLS-K.
References
  • [1]  Baker, B. D., Punswick, E., & Belt, C. (2010). School leadership stability, principal moves, and departures: Evidence from Missouri. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(4), 523-557. doi:10.1177/0013161X10383832.
  • [2]  Borg, D., & Slate, J. R. (2014). Principals' leadership emphases as a function of school performance. Frontiers in Education, 2(1), 1-5.
  • [3]  Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • [4]  Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D. (1999). Shaping school culture: The heart of leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • [5]  Farley-Ripple, E. N., Raffel, J. A., & Welch, J. C. (2012). Administrator career paths and decision processes. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(6), 788-816. doi:10.1108/09578231211264694.
  • [6]  Fink, D., & Brayman, C. (2006). School leadership succession and the challenges of change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 62-89. doi:10.1177/0013161X05278186.
  • [7]  Hall, G., & Hord, S. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • [8]  Huff, T. S., Brockmeier, L. L., Leech, D. W., Martin, E. P., Pate, J. L., & Siegrist, G. (2011). Principal and school-level effects on student achievement. National Teacher Education Journal, 4(2), 67-79.
  • [9]  Mascall, B., & Leithwood, K. (2010). Investing in leadership: The district’s role in managing principal turnover. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9, 367-383. doi:10.1080/15700763.2010.493633.
  • [10]  Miller, A. (2013). Principal turnover and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 36, 60-72. doi:10.1016.2013.05.004.
  • [11]  National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten class of 1998-99: Combined user's manual for the ECLS fifth-grade data files and electronic codebooks. Retrieved from http://www.nces.ed.gov/ecls.
  • [12]  Nettles, S., & Petscher, Y. (2006, April). An examination of the relationship between the implementation practices of school principals and student achievement in reading. Paper presented at the annual American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA.
  • [13]  Papa, F., Jr. (2007). Why do principals change schools? A multivariate analysis of principal retention. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(3), 267-290. doi:10.1080/15700760701263725.
  • [14]  Partlow, M. C., & Ridenour, C. S. (2008). Frequency of principal turnover in Ohio’s elementary schools. MidWestern Educational Researcher, 21(2), 15-23.
  • [15]  Pijanowski, J. C., & Brady, K. P. (2009). The influence of salary in attracting and retaining school leaders.Education and Urban Society, 42(1), 25-41. doi:10.1177/0013124509342952.
  • [16]  Slate, J. R., & Rojas-LeBouef, A. (2011). Calculating basic statistical procedures in SPSS: A self-help and practical guide to preparing theses, dissertations, and manuscripts. Ypsilanti, MI: NCPEA Press.
  • [17]  Tekleselassie, A. A., & Villarreal, P. (2011). Career mobility and departure intentions among school principals in the United States: Incentives and disincentives. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(3), 251-293. doi:10.1080/15700763.2011.585536
  • [18]  Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Copyright © 2017 Isaac Scientific Publishing Co. All rights reserved.